QBI deduction and rental real estate

December 18, 2019

By Ron Roberson, CPA

Historically, the tax consequences of whether or not a particular rental real estate activity was a trade or business activity were minimal. Income from rental real estate is not subject to self-employment tax regardless if the activity is a trade or business (§1402(a)(1)). All rental related expenses are deductible under either §162 (trade or business) or §212 (investment).

However, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act created the Qualified Business Income deduction (QBI or §199A deduction), which provides a deduction equal to 20% of net qualified trade or business income, including real estate rental activities that are deemed to be trade or business activities.

FIND OUT HOW THIS EFFECTS YOUR CLIENTS:

Catch nationally-known Ron Roberson, CPA — back by popular demand — at the OSCPA's Two-Day Federal Tax Update, January 16-17, 2020 in Midwest City.

CONTINUE READING BELOW

The problem is the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) does not define when a rental real estate activity rises to the level of a trade or business activity, and the recently finalized regulations fail to provide definitive guidance. In the Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions (SCER) section of the regulations, the IRS noted the rental of a single property that requires regular and continuous involvement may qualify as a trade or business. However, the IRS also opined that the rental of a single piece of property does not rise to the level of a trade or business in every case as a matter of law. Essentially, tax professionals have been left to derive their own conclusions in each situation based on IRS guidance and court cases—in other words, the facts and circumstances of each rental activity must be assessed in order to determine whether a particular rental activity satisfies the trade or business activity requirement.

Can §469 or §1411 help?

Practitioners may be tempted to look to other code sections for guidance, such as the passive activity rules (especially the material participation rules) to assist in QBI decisions. This would be a huge mistake. The SCER section of the final QBI regulations make it clear the passive rules serve a very different purpose than the QBI deduction and thus should not be relied on in any way when making decisions about QBI (SCER ll.A.3.a.). Some practitioners may also wish to rely on the net investment income (NII) tax rules to help define trade or business activities. However, the NII tax applies to passive activities, regardless if the passive activity is an investment, trade or business. In other words, you could have a rental activity that is subject to NII tax and still qualify as a trade or business for QBI purposes.

So, what do the courts say?

In P. Groetzinger v. Comm., which is the seminal case in this area, the Supreme Court noted the determination of whether or not an activity is carried on as a trade or business must be made for each activity using the specific facts and circumstances of that activity. There is no bright line test. Furthermore, the Supreme Court held the four most important factors to be reviewed to make such determination are whether the activity is pursued:

  1. On a full-time basis;
  2. With regularity;
  3. Continuously; and
  4. For the purpose of making a profit.

While all four of these factors are not required, the more factors that are met, the more likely the activity is carried on as a trade or business.

Some other cases to note:

  • Murtaugh, James B. v. Comm., TC Memo 1997-319, where a taxpayer who used a property manager to rent two timeshare interests was found to be in a trade or business.
  • Gilford v. Comm., 201 F.2d735 (2d Cir.1953), where taxpayers with fractional interests in real estate rentals and who had no involvement other than hiring a property manager were treated as being in a trade or business. The underlying work of the property manager elevated the activity to the level of a trade or business regardless of the taxpayer’s involvement.
  • Grier et al. v. U.S., 120 F. Supp. 395 (1954) USDC D. Connecticut, where a taxpayer inherited a single-family home, rented it for 12 years to the same tenant and then sold it. The court ruled the taxpayer did not have enough activity to make the rental a trade or business.

IRS adds its own guidelines.

In the SCER section of the final QBI regulations, the IRS noted the factors to be considered when determining whether an activity is a trade or business include: a) type of property rented; b) number of properties rented; c) level of day-to-day involvement by owner(s) or agent(s); d) ancillary services provided by lease; and e) the lease term (e.g., long-term lease vs. short-term lease) (§1.199A Regs, Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions (SCER) Section ll.A.3.b.).

Regulations provide guidance in two instances of rental activities: self-rentals and rentals as a trade or business safe harbor.

Self-rentals as a trade or business (§1.199A-1(b)(14): Rent or licensing of tangible or intangible property (rental activity) will be treated as a trade or business for QBI purposes if the property is rented or licensed to a trade or business conducted by the individual or a relevant pass-through entity (RPE), which is commonly controlled (as defined by §1.199A-4(b)(1)(I)).

Real estate as a trade or business safe harbor (Notice 2019-7): This notice creates a safe harbor that taxpayers may rely on to establish that a rental real estate activity is a trade or business solely for purposes of the QBI deduction. The safe harbor may be used by individuals and relevant passthrough entities (RPEs) (i.e., S corporations, partnerships and some estates and trusts).

Note: This is only a safe harbor. Failure to satisfy the requirements of the safe harbor does not preclude a taxpayer from otherwise establishing that a rental real estate activity is a trade or business for QBI purposes. Taxpayers may always rely on their own facts and circumstances to establish that an activity is a trade or business.

Watch for the 1099 trap!

The IRS specifically said in its Summary of Comments in the final QBI regulations that “taxpayers should consider the appropriateness of treating a rental activity as a trade or business for purposes of §199A where the taxpayer does not comply with the information return filing requirements under §6041.” The IRS is referring to Forms 1099. The penalty for not filing 1099s can be as much as $1,060 per 1099.

WANT TO LEARN MORE?

Catch nationally-known Ron Roberson, CPA — back by popular demand — at the OSCPA's Two-Day Federal Tax Update, January 16-17, 2020 in Midwest City.

Ron Roberson, CPA, is a well-known tax lecturer who has more than 20 years of experience teaching throughout the U.S. Roberson annually speaks to thousands of tax professionals about the latest business and personal tax law developments using his sense of humor and friendly speaking style to keep people coming back year after year. In addition to authoring multiple tax articles and manuals, Roberson also continues to work with his partner in a tax and accounting practice in Sonora, Calif. He includes real-life examples from his practice to make tax issues come alive and help complicated subject matter make more sense.